What are the 5 words that best describe your life right now?
Submitted by mojito.
optimistic
driven
satisfied
reunited
liberated
What are the 5 words that best describe your life right now?
Submitted by mojito.
optimistic
driven
satisfied
reunited
liberated
I'm so glad
no one sees these tears
there's no way I could explain
haven't been this down in years
listening to slo-jams
lo-jams, wishing
and dying and hoping
for days in the future -- to just
mildly resemble the past
you could have told me
two years ago
that I would soon
be feeling low
shirking advances
from every-day joes,
praying tomorrow is
half as good as yesterday
just knowing nothing
I do will make tomorrow
be yesterday
I wouldn't have believed you anyhow
but damn sure -- I believe you now
the knitting I took up
comes along fine -- so well
in fact, I nearly forget who
I'm wishing was mine
bell ringers chime
in the holidays
besides that, every day
is everyday
and soon tomorrow will be
next year
maybe that's the key
to uncovering the new me
maybe I'm just around the corner
waking from a dream
no more days spent
wond'rin' where the money's
coming from
dancing to a different drum
as mere method toward
evading the present
avoiding the peasant life
ending the tragedy by
falling on my knife --
been your Juliet all along
you just didn't know it
'til the posthumous publication
of your song
happy new year, my love,
happy new year
I'm a math person. This doesn't mean I'm good at calculator math; it simply means I'm emphatic about having a method. One must always have a method, scrutinize the method, continue using it if it works, and change methods when it fails. That being said, it seems like every answer I give to method topics involves an algorithm-esque answer:
Q: What's your method for calculating a tip?
Assumptions:
Method (by cases)
- Food/beverage establishments anticipate tips and adjust wages downward accordingly; therefore it is the patron's implicit responsibility to include gratuity (unless the "service" was horrible)
- Guideposts for how much gratuity are generally 10 to 20%
- Tips are made on a total-bill and not item-by-item basis, as can be the case at drinking establishments
Case 1. The service made your "Big Three" list of worst ever experiences.
All bets are off. Tip the spare change from the gap between the bill and the next whole dollar, tip nothing, or on sheer principle and compassion, tip ten percent. Follow the Case 2 procedure of tipping one tenth of the bill, rounded to the closest dollar (formula 1).
Case 2. The service was unremarkable (formula 1).
The server did most of her/his literal job description, but that's all. Ten percent (formula 1):Case 3. The service was above average to great (formula 2).
- move the decimal one place to the left ( = bill divided by ten)
- add that to the bill, rounding up to the next dollar to obtain the total
- You've just tipped 10%
Tip twenty percent and feel free to add extra, proportionately to how above-average the service was:
- move the decimal one place to the left ( = bill divided by ten)
- double it (result is your tip)
- add that to the bill, rounding to the closest whole dollar (standard rounding) to obtain the total
- You've just tipped 20%
I decided what I will do with this writing space on Vox. Among possible other uses for the music, book, and audio features, I will be using it primarily to finally post my poetry, which I am trying to assemble for self-publication. Before I actually reach the point of syndicating it here, though, I have to organize a bit more. In the mean time, Seamus Heaney will do nicely.
phone line dead
Tuesday night
Wednesday reconciliation
late-night conversation
no sleep for her
call connected
while he rested
Thursday morning
phone call ended
silence
nothing
placid void
against her judgment
sent a text
Friday evening
premonition
she's been here before
once
in early March
this silence, the very same --
twice is enough
never again
Saturday planner:
"today is a new day"
I'm experimenting with Vox's audio feature, and so far I'm very impressed. One thing I still don't know, though, is how to display a specific image with each audio entry. In any case, please enjoy my original piano music within the limits of its Creative Commons license (Attribution, Share Alike). Cheers.
One brother is having his own drama these days, so I try to keep the shared version(s) of my personal drama to bullet-point, Cliff's Notes format, out of fear of the whole lot tiring of "dealing" with "all the crap." It this rate we'll want to raincheck Christmas!
My on-again off-again source of drama is with someone I love deeply, and ,in that movie script sort of way, whom I always will love. Nonetheless, my highly opinionated self has gone into hibernation after painting herself into a binary choice:
He has articulated his firmly held position that probably ALL disagreed issues can be distributed across manageable categories of resolution techniques:
The last couple weeks, perhaps longer, I have resorted to simply disengaging my disagreement with any attitudes, values, or behaviors he displays. Discourse between us has been much more peaceful but markedly more distant. I'm okay with that, as I've more or less determined at this point that nothing I say will change him; we're not married and we don't live together; consequently I should stop trying to change him and move on as my desires/experience dictate.
He told me via text message that he had the day off from about 8:30 a.m. onward (having begun around 5:30 a.m.). In addition to celebrating having the day off, he mentioned that he loved me. This practice is relatively standard from him, used to be for both of us; I have recently only been saying it when I feel that not saying it is a louder statement, never initiated, often unresponded or I change the subject. This is me attempting to keep my words in strictly parallel expressions with my actual sentiments. Brilliant, right? I should write this shit down or something.
We went the whole day without speaking on the phone, even though we were both "available." I wasn't feeling well and spent a few hours resting in the afternoon. I missed a call from him around 7:00p.m. and managed to call back about an hour later. Here's how the call went:
Politics, blah blah
blah.
Iraq War, Habeas
Corpus, Military Commissions Act, blah blah blah.
Phone call time
display: 27:53…54…55…
me: Well I do have to go now. Do you want me to call you when I get back?
R: [playful] You know… if you let me later, I love you long time. [more serious] It’s just that… well, it feels like you’ve been distancing yourself from me lately, and I know that’s not true; it’s just that I need a little assurance that it’s not.
me: [uncomfortable pause] You know, R, there have always been moments when something bothers me and I just don’t tell you.
R: Well you should tell me then. You know you can always…
me: When I’ve tried that in the past, it just caused further pain for both of us.
R: [silence…] Then don’t bother calling me back later. If we can go on and on talking about whatever but when it comes to focusing on us we can’t …. Well then it’s just not worth our time.
[silence on the line]
R: I’ll let you go then.
me: [silence]
R: I’ll let you go then, I said.
me: I heard you.
[more silence]
Flashing display on my
phone indicating the call has ended.
Call time display
blinking, shouting: 31:03…31:03…31:03…
…then I’ll let you go, too.
Orwell is on my mind today. Tomorrow is midterm election day, and my brain is saturated with society, war and politics. Here's a snippet, courtesy of George Orwell, 1984:
The Party said that Oceania had never been in alliance with Eurasia. He, Winston Smith, knew that Oceania had been in alliance with Eurasia as short a time as four years ago. But where did that knowledge exist? Only in his own consciousness, which in any case must soon be annihilated. And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed -- if all records told the same tale -- then the lie passed into history and became truth. "Who controls the past," ran the Party slogan, "controls the future: who controls the present controls the past." And yet the past, though of its nature alterable never had been altered. Whatever was true now was true from everlasting to everlasting. It was quite simple. All that was needed was an unending series of victories over your own memory. "Reality control," they called it; in Newspeak, "doublethink."
...He wondered, as he had many times wondered before, whether he himself was a lunatic. Perhaps a lunatic was simply a minority of one. At one time it had been a sign of madness to believe that the earth goes round the sun: today, to believe that the past is unalterable. He might be alone in holding that belief, and if alone, then a lunatic. But the thought of being a lunatic did not greatly trouble him; the horror was that he might also be wrong.
...The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. His heart sank as he thought of the enorous power arrayed against him, the ease with which any Party intellectual would overthrow him in debate, the subtle arguments which he would not be able to understand, much less answer. And yet he was in the right! They were wrong and he was right. The obvious, the silly, and the true had got to be defended. Truisms are true, hold on to that! The solid world exists, its laws do not change. Stones are hard, water is wet, objects unsupported fall toward the earth's center. With the feeling that he was setting forth an important axiom, he wrote:
